In India, the taxation of electricity presents a nuanced and multifaceted issue, blending constitutional provisions, economic considerations, and social impacts. With the Goods and Services Tax (GST) transforming the indirect tax landscape, discussions about including electricity under GST have gained traction led by industries which are likely to benefit. This blog delves into why imposing GST on electricity might not be easy and prudent, explores the constitutional provisions governing this issue, and analyses the potential impacts on domestic and industrial consumers, including the aspect of Input Tax Credit (ITC).
Why Implementing GST on Electricity might be difficult
Electricity is an indispensable commodity
for both households and industries. It powers homes, businesses, and essential
services, making its affordability a critical concern. Imposing GST on
electricity would likely increase its cost, making it less affordable for
consumers and sparking significant public opposition. India’s per capita
electricity consumption is lower than that of its peer countries. Adding any
additional burden on tariffs is unlikely to help increase per capita
consumption, which serves as a proxy for development.
Including electricity under GST could lead
to higher electricity prices, contributing to inflation. Increased energy costs
translate into higher production costs for goods and services subsequently
raising their prices. This inflationary trend could affect the overall economy,
reducing purchasing power and impacting economic growth.
The current regulatory framework for
electricity already involves multiple state-level taxes and surcharges. Adding
GST to this mix could complicate compliance for electricity providers,
increasing administrative burdens and possibly leading to regulatory overlap
and inefficiencies.
States employ a system of cross-subsidies, where higher electricity tariffs for industrial and commercial users subsidize lower tariffs for domestic and agricultural users. Imposing GST could disrupt these subsidies, making electricity less affordable for vulnerable populations and potentially leading to social unrest.
Constitutional Provisions on Imposition of GST on Electricity
Seventh Schedule of the Indian
Constitution- While Electricity falls under the Concurrent List (Entry 38),
meaning both the Central and State governments can legislate on this subject,
Taxes on the consumption or sale of electricity are specifically mentioned as a
state subject (Entry 53). This grant states the authority to impose taxes on
electricity, making it a revenue source for them, however, the shared
jurisdiction on law making complicates any unilateral move to include
electricity under GST.
Article 279A and the GST Council -The GST Council, established under Article 279A of the Constitution, is responsible for making recommendations on the inclusion of goods and services under GST. For electricity to be included, a consensus within the GST Council, which includes both Central and State government representatives, is required. However, before that, a constitutional amendment may be needed to levy shared taxes (GST) by the Centre and States on electricity.
Impact of GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) on Consumers & Discoms
a) Domestic and Agricultural Consumers:
Domestic and agricultural consumers
typically do not have any output tax liability, so they would not benefit from
ITC. The GST paid on electricity would result in a direct cost increase,
impacting affordability and straining household budgets, especially for lower-
and middle-income families. This could adversely affect their quality of life
and lead to a further reduction in already low per capita consumption.
Similarly, the imposition of GST would increase electricity costs for
irrigation and other farming activities, raising operational costs and
straining the financial viability of farming, particularly for small and
marginal farmers. Higher farming costs could also contribute to increased food
inflation.
Moreover, the number of domestic and agricultural consumers far exceeds that of commercial and industrial consumers, impacting the political economy significantly.
b) Industrial Consumers
Including electricity under GST would increase the working capital requirements and tax liability for Discoms. They would need to pay GST on electricity purchases, which could raise operational costs unless adequately compensated by Input Tax Credit (ITC). Discoms would also face an increased compliance burden under the GST regime, requiring them to manage GST filings, ITC claims, and other regulatory requirements, which could strain their administrative resources. While Discoms could benefit from ITC on the GST paid for inputs such as equipment, maintenance services, and other operational expenses, thereby improving cash flow management and reducing overall costs if efficiently managed, any delays in realizing ITC could impact their cash flows. Additionally, commercial losses are likely to increase due to the incidence of taxes on billed but unrealized amounts. Discoms might need to pass on the increased GST costs to consumers through higher tariffs, leading to resistance from consumers and potential regulatory challenges. Non-compliance with GST regulations could result in penalties, fines, and interest charges, adding to the financial burden of Discoms. Persistent non-compliance could lead to legal issues, including audits and investigations by tax authorities, further straining the resources and reputation of Discoms. Currently, generating companies' payments are prioritized, but under the GST regime, the priority of claims would shift to GST payments.
Conclusion
Any move to bring electricity under the GST
regime would require broad consensus among stakeholders, including the Central
and State governments. It necessitates a thorough examination of potential
impacts on inflation, industrial competitiveness, and social equity.
No comments:
Post a Comment